Unknown Smith & Wesson Top Break Copy

Restricted

The RCMP Firearms Reference Table records the Unknown Smith & Wesson Top Break Copy (revolver, chambered in .32 S&W, .320 Revolver Short Centerfire, .38 S&W and 2 more, made in Unknown) as Restricted in Canada, under FRN 75574.

Reference table record

FRN
75574
Make
Unknown
Model
Smith & Wesson Top Break Copy
Classification
Restricted
Type
Handgun
Action
Revolver
Country
Unknown

Calibres on this record

.32 S&W.320 Revolver Short Centerfire.38 S&W.44 S&W Russian.455 Revolver

Sourced from the published RCMP Firearms Reference Table. This is a reference, not a legal determination — confirm with the Canadian Firearms Program before a transfer, an import, or anything else that turns on the classification.

Unknown Smith & Wesson Top Break Copy for sale on GunEx

View all 1

Common questions

Is the Unknown Smith & Wesson Top Break Copy restricted in Canada?

The RCMP Firearms Reference Table records the Unknown Smith & Wesson Top Break Copy (revolver, chambered in .32 S&W, .320 Revolver Short Centerfire, .38 S&W and 2 more, made in Unknown) as Restricted in Canada, under FRN 75574. Classification attaches to the specific firearm rather than the model name, so variants with a different barrel length, overall length or action can carry a different class. Confirm the record matches the firearm in front of you, and verify with the RCMP Canadian Firearms Program before any transfer.

What licence do I need to buy a Unknown Smith & Wesson Top Break Copy?

A restricted PAL, and the firearm must be registered to you before you take possession. Transport generally requires an authorization to transport, and if this is a handgun the October 2022 transfer freeze applies to most transfers between individuals.

What is FRN 75574?

FRN 75574 is the Firearm Reference Number the RCMP assigns to this Unknown Smith & Wesson Top Break Copy record in the Firearms Reference Table. Quoting the FRN is the unambiguous way to identify a firearm in a transfer, a registration or an import, because model names are reused across variants that are not classified alike.